Claude Code 团队如何做代码审查：Addy Osmani 等谈「人类是否读过代码」是个不精确的代理指标

Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang

AI 导读

Addy Osmani、Morgan Westlee Lunt 和 Qing Wang 认为「人类是否读过这段代码」是判断变更风险的粗略代理指标，应改为追问「这次改动可能出什么问题、该用哪种检查来抓」。这改变了审查发生的时机：过去审查是流程终点的关卡，如今审查持续进行，更像写作时的拼写检查。大多数改动在交给人类之前已被 Claude 至少审查并修复过一次。

正文

16th October 2026

We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?"

Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague.

Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny.

— Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, How the Claude Code team does code review

来源：Simon Willison · simonwillison.net